June 9, 2021

Developer Disses Pedestrian Friendly Street in New Zealand

 

In the “you just can’t make this stuff up” department, here’s one to stick in the time machine and revisit in a few decades. It was Women in Urbanism in Aotearoa who first called this out.

New Zealand has a population very similar to British Columbia’s with 4.9 million people versus B.C.’s 5.0 million (2019 figures). Granted, they are surrounded by ocean on all sides. New Zealand does not have the influences of Seattle, Portland, and other places that are working towards creating “Fifteen minute cities”. This concept sees other modes of travel beside private vehicles as being organized to promote walkable, bikeable, accessible communities within reach of schools, shops and services.

It was work by Victoria Walks in Australia that researched the distance that senior citizens would walk to shops. To everyone’ surprise, that distance turned out to be exactly the same as a young person, which was one kilometer. That’s a pretty healthy metric for making commercial areas more sociable, and less vehicle dominated.

Research by Transport for London shows that making streets more pedestrian and cyclist friendly  increased time spent on retail streets by 216 percent between shopping, patronizing local cafes and sitting on street benches. Retail space vacancies declined by 17 percent.  But the best news, and this is also in line with research conducted in Toronto and in New York City “people walking, cycling and using public transport spend the most in local shops, spending 40 percent  more each month than car drivers”.

But sadly the great success of London’s pedestrian focus in commercial areas had not reached the developers of Hamilton, New Zealand.

 Chloe Bommerde of Stuff.Co  wrote the story about a “top developer” in the City of Hamilton who was aghast that Ward Street, a main commercial street had  temporarily stripped  parking off the street.  For a few months planters and pedestrian furniture placed, and the road painted with colourful designs. This is a strictly time limited installation that will have an evaluation by all users in July, and aimed to connect two downtown parks with a  safe street to walk, roll and bicycle on in the downtown commercial area. You can read about this temporary project here.

This was part of Waka Kotahi’s 29 million dollar  Innovating Streets Project designed to help town councils to create pedestrian friendly spaces to encourage walking and cycling.  Waka Kotahi is the  Māori name for  “the concept of ‘travelling together as one’ and embraces integration, affordability, safety, responsiveness and sustainability.” Since 2008 it has been the name of the New Zealand Transportation Agency.

Hamilton developer Matt Stark’s reaction was like stepping back in Vancouver thirty years ago. This developer liked the business as usual approach to downtown streets, calling the redesign an “embarrassment” and actually saying the changes “set the city up to fail and stop progress on other streets in the city”.

It’s no surprise that Mr. Stark who is planning a sixty million dollar development on a car park site did not want access impeded to his new development or other businesses on the street, and felt that walking half a block would deter business on the street with the loss of several on-street parking spaces.

It was Women in Urbanism Aoteroa that responded on Twitter that it was “typical” to see entitled men
” at the forefront of complaints about #InnovatingStreets. They don’t like things looking colourful/playful. All things the kids & young adults are loving! Newsflash Stark – cities ain’t just for you & your bougie mates.”

But it also shows how far we have come in Canada in trialing different ways to share streets and establishing what works best for different situations. That has also been a positive outcome of the pandemic, learning how to prioritise people ahead of vehicles in moving on city streets.

To get an idea of what Hamilton’s main street district looks like, take a look at the YouTube video below at 2:27.

 

Posted in

Support

If you love this region and have a view to its future please subscribe, donate, or become a Patron.

Share on

Comments

  1. If you take the time on Google Streetview to go down Ward St you might come to a different conclusion about this project. That block of Ward St is utterly chaotic from a pedestrian point of view — big empty stretches (particularly because of the very large parking lot) and long featureless storefronts, one of which is a car service business and another which is blank except for the car access to an underground parking lot. Several properties are vacant and the remains of the demolished buildings that used to sit on them serve only as walls to contain parked cars. Apart from a couple of small restaurants, one of which is for fast food, there doesn’t seem to be anything you’d want to walk to, let along walk by. In fact, the next block is already a pedestrian street and it has all the things you’d expect to want to close a street for: pedestrian scale, suitable stores on either side, etc etc. From this viewpoint, the block of Ward St now in question looks like the perfect street to use as parking so that people can easily walk to the pedestrian street.

    Now, I’m a big fan of closing streets in city centres. Exeter, England is a great example. But it looks like I agree with the developer on this one.

    1. No. The “top developer” is just another toffish man-baby who’s convinced the world exists solely for him to issue instructions to. New Zealand is filled with them. I’ve been to Ward Street in Hamilton. It’s a parallel downtown collector with some mixed uses that terminates at the high street. It’s a perfect candidate for pedestrianization and the loss of 50 or so on-street parking spaces is not an inconvenience. It’s just change, as horrifying and distasteful as that is to some people.

      1. There’s a vastly bigger problem on Ward St than the cars parking on it: the streetscape is chaotic and there’s nothing much to relate to pedestrians. If they really want to make it a vital pedestrian street they should be working to fill the gaps along the street with pedestrian-friendly buildings. Now maybe that’s their plan and maybe they know that it takes long time to get buildings built and a short time to get cars removed and the street painted, so maybe this is just a declaration of intent, and that’s ok. And maybe this is a defensive move to let him know that he’s not going to get everything he wants, and that’s ok too. But absent those things (and they are absent in the article so who knows), the removal of parking is a pretty empty gesture and not worth applauding on its own.

  2. Innovating Streets is just NZ’s brand of tactical urbanism, and the bright colours that so offend Mr Stark are part of the trial. It would be good if they’re a lightning rod and there’s no real complaint about the substance – but he does seem genuinely dismayed by there not being more parking. Looking at Google Earth (satellite, not Streetview) of this street is really enlightening. It is *surrounded* by seas of parking – it’s like a mini Houston. And most streets are stroads, with predictable hostility to anyone outside a car.

    The important thing is that this street should be at least a decent connector – between the big girls’ high school / polytechnic college / popular shared pathway through a park, and the town centre. But for those who haven’t been lucky enough to go on it (most readers here!?) it was a horrible black spot where anyone outside a car (bike, scooting, walking, whatever) dodged bumpers every 20 seconds or so and the cars went *fast*. Now, for all that it’s got some weird pastel stuff going on, it’s now way safer to be on when you’re outside a car. (FYI I saw still 10 or so carparks on street plus some disability ones)

    Some of the driving-centric locals are wailing and gnashing their teeth at having to actually concentrate while parking onstreet. And don’t even get them started at having to pay more attention when driving over the footway into /out of the driveways. Grrr!

    But seriously: one’s personal taste being offended, and minor decreases in convenience for those protected by 2 tonnes of steel, just don’t hold weight compared with better survival and less mortal peril for real people on the street.

    End of.

    1. That’s really interesting. I hadn’t looked far enough away from the centre of the discussion. With the high school a block away in one direction and the shopping mall a block away in the other, the foot traffic must be significant. And with such a chaotic block in between, maybe removing as many cars as possible was the only thing that could be easily done to make it more pedestrian friendly.

Subscribe to Viewpoint Vancouver

A fresh look at the history and future of our region.

Join 7,254 other subscribers

Show your Support

Make a one-time donation, or check our Patreon page for stylish coffee mugs, private city tours, and more. Thank you for helping shape this place we love.

Popular Articles

See All

All Articles