Here are several items from PT readers:
.
.
Doug Clarke:
Cyclists would be safer around self-driving cars. Self-driving cars would be compliant with regulations. A big shift in the whole experience of using the roads, for all users.
.
Ken Ohrn:
Note how this plays out. The robo-car gives absolute priority to the person on the bike. Ya know, so that no one gets killed. We can only wish for this sort of behaviour from that lethal minority of aggressive, risk-taking or drunk or distracted motor vehicle operators. Ya know, those people whose actions we choose to ignore. And let the blood flow.
.
___________________
.
From North Van City Mayor Darrell Mussatto who rode a bike escalator while no doubt thinking of Lonsdale: “I made my way to Trondheim, Norway, to check this out. It does the job for recreational cyclists!! Love it!”
.
.
___________________
.
Ken Ohrn also sums up a piece, unfortunately not linkable, from Australia on helmet laws:
Bike helmet laws a turn-off
Doctors have urged parliament to dismantle laws requiring cyclists to wear helmets, saying the safety measure is dissuading unfit Australians from riding their bicycles.
In short:
- Helmets are good. They might save a head injury in a few types of crash.
- Mandatory helmet laws are bad. They discourage people from riding their bikes, so they don’t reap the immediate and personal benefits of riding.
- There are much better ways to keep people on bikes safe.
.
___________________
.
A month old, but worth posting because, hey, it’s in The Province and its positive:
.
___________________
.
Our Vancouver Diarist, Dianna passes along this observation:
A friend recently installed a seat on her bike for her two-year-old son and they went for their first ride around their neighbourhood. On the first hill Mom realized that climbing with an additional 28 pounds plus the seat required her to stand up to pedal. What fun for her young passenger who pounded his tiny fists on her back, “Faster, mommie, faster faster!”
Then (and here you need to see things from his point of view) he puts one chubby hand on each side of her bottom and giggled, “Poot! Poot! Poot!” – the sound, it seems, that her, um, butt was making. All the way up the hill, I understand, Mom struggled to breath while laughing.
.
___________________
.
Another one from Ohrn:
Spinlister is part of the emerging and quickly growing sharing economy (AirBnB, Uber, Lyft) and here is reviewed by Vancouverite Hilary Angus on location in New Orleans.
.
Perhaps this could work for dear old Soggyville, providing an availability threshold can be reached. It does seem to be more suitable for visitors, tourists and those who want longer-term access, and less for the local citizen who just wants to get a bike for a few minutes, go somewhere, dock it and be done.
Find out more here: click on “How It Works” to see an explanatory video.
.
___________________
.
Colin Brander picked up on this:
.
WASHINGTON — The Capital Bikeshare program is easing D.C.’s traffic congestion, a new study suggests.
“The introduction of a Capital Bike Share dock reduced traffic congestion by about 2 to 3 percent in its immediate area,” said Casey J. Wichman, fellow at think tank Resources for the Future.


















It’s important to have a second bike. It’s good for lending to an out of town guest. Also good for when your main one needs some work and you don’t have time to deal with it.
If you can make a bit of money from it that would be cool too.
Here’s another of cyclists behaving very badly, perhaps goaded on by a misplaced sense of Critical Mass empowerment:
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2015/09/no-fixed-abode-rage-zipcar/#more-1165746
A cyclist was playing that game with me yesterday. All decked out in tight yellow and black lycra with Campagnolo ads all over, he was deliberately taking the centre of the lane at traffic lights, then holding the centre of the roadway so nobody could pass him. He was just waiting for someone to challenge him, looking for a fight. At each pedestrian crossing he would zip fast down the inside then swerve left, into the centre of the roadway. He was begging to be hit. Filled with rage.
I know we’ll pry the steering wheel from your cold, dead, hands, but please humour me for a moment and pretend for a moment that you’re a cyclist with a destination and a schedule to keep. What route would you choose? If that route included a major street, where on that street would you ride?
While you’re thinking of an answer let’s quickly review the fact that nearly all drivers who injure cyclists claim that they didn’t see them until it was too late (or didn’t see them at all).
So maybe the reason the guy in black and yellow put himself in the middle of the road was to ensure that no operator of a two, five or ten tonne machine would tell the paramedics that they didn’t see him.
And even if he was taking things too far, riding too aggressively and thumbing his nose at those whose steel cages are too big to slip between the others, rage is not an appropriate response.
What an odd interpretation of someone else’s behaviour.
Clinical study in projection, it seems to me.
Eric needs to watch these. Why aren’t drivers required to know this stuff when they get their licenses?
https://youtu.be/o9pmw2ckQSU
https://youtu.be/L08MY2OMkRY
https://youtu.be/0GC9Amu4Ld4
http://cyclingsavvy.org/hows-my-driving/