Their mandate was to address “concerns about both the cost and availability of housing” – which makes it immediately relevant for, oh, us. And boy, for a city even more dominated by the culture of the single-family homeowner, did they ever – even provoking comment on the racist origins of such exclusionary zoning.
There’s been more comment than I can keep up with, but I’ve selected some of the analysis and comments, beginning with Jim Street, who served on Seattle Council in the 1980s and early ’90s:
UNLESS the attitudes of Seattle citizens have changed radically since I chaired the City Council’s land-use committee 20 years ago, the recent Housing Affordability and Livability Advisory (HALA) Committee’s plan will generate some political earthquakes. Mayor Ed Murray’s plan will force all of us to consider how we balance our attachment to what we define as our “livable neighborhoods” with our progressive commitment to affordable housing for the people who work in our city.
Since I left office, gentrification has accelerated. It’s a moral issue with winners and losers. Those who can hold onto their homes and those who can afford the higher rents benefit from the upgrading of the neighborhood and nearby commercial services. Those who cannot afford the higher rents or higher property taxes move to South King County or beyond. Seattle becomes a city where a significant proportion of the people who work here cannot afford to live here.
After 10 months of meetings, HALA finally released a 76-page report that was not (thank god!) middling and vague and merely Seattle nice. It tackles racism and classism head-on, makes sweeping calls for different kinds of zoning and new regulations on developers, and strengthens protections for tenants. The report calls for the creation of 50,000 new housing units over the next 10 years, including 20,000 that are affordable at 80 percent of the area’s median income level and below. (Eighty percent of area median income is $57,000 for a family of two; affordable rent at that income level is $1,434 a month for a one-bedroom.)
At the heart of the deal is what the mayor calls a “grand bargain” between grassroots housing activists and big developers, which, for the first time, forces developers to build affordable housing into certain kinds of new units—an agreement the parties reached at the very last minute.
Mayor Ed Murray’s affordable housing committee is contemplating an actual challenge to Seattle’s status quo. … Murray’s committee wants to rewrite longstanding Seattle law that protects real Seattle privilege: Your supposed Constitutional right to single family zoning.
It’s easy for Seattle liberals to support something like a developer fee because it doesn’t touch them. But simultaneously holding single-family zones harmless for the very problem that Seattle’s 1950s, suburban template has created—skyrocketing housing costs—is untenable (or as Murray’s committee says, “is no longer sustainable.”)
So, how will liberals feel about a policy that actually comes to their front doors? …
Sightline provides daily updates. Subscribe here.