October 30, 2012

Why does Toronto need phallic reinforcement?

Oh sorry, I mean:

Why is it that Toronto is suddenly going for skyscrapers on steroids — is this a matter of need or desire?

Jennifer Keesmaat, Toronto’s chief planner, says if the city focuses on building midrise buildings along the avenues — streets planners have designated as ripe for growth — Toronto can meet the province’s growth targets without 80 storey buildings, and with “significant amount of room to spare.”

The city especially doesn’t require super skyscrapers within such a small area, particularly one already entertaining dozens of building applications.

More speculation here in The Star.

Posted in

Support

If you love this region and have a view to its future please subscribe, donate, or become a Patron.

Share on

Comments

  1. The problem with skyscrapers is not how high they go, but what they do at ground level, in my opinion. The developer’s focus is so much on height, he too often neglects how people will relate to the structure on the street. Case in point: Erickson et al’s Shangri-La, which has a very awkward and boring space on Georgia (and a very expensive Whole Foods). At least the Wall Centre’s One Wall Centre has a fairly decent plaza. So much attention is given to the skyline. What counts for livability is street level!

Subscribe to Viewpoint Vancouver

Get breaking news and fresh views, direct to your inbox.

Join 2,277 other subscribers

Show your Support

Check our Patreon page for stylish coffee mugs, private city tours, and more – or, make a one-time or recurring donation. Thank you for helping shape this place we love.

Popular Articles

See All

All Articles