May 3, 2017

The Election: Praise for Any Platform?

An Inquiring Mind would like to know:
Are there any platform ideas or policies in any party’s platform that are particularly innovative, fresh, interesting or just worth trying? How about any transit or development-related tidbits worth singling out?
 

Posted in

Support

If you love this region and have a view to its future please subscribe, donate, or become a Patron.

Share on

Comments

  1. The Green Party platform does not have a separate section on transit. This seems to me to be a welcome change since it gets treated as part of dealing with wider issues. For instance under the heading of “increasing the supply of affordable housing”

    35.
    Lead a comprehensive rethink of zoning to ensure it is consistent with government objectives such as the provision of affordable housing. Issues for consideration include densification, especially along transit corridors; revitalizing neighborhoods surrounding schools; cultural and social amenities; and complete communities.

    under “strategy for public assets”


    INVEST IN FREQUENT, AFFORDABLE PUBLIC TRANSIT
    143.
    Provide an additional $25 million per year to address frequency of service and affordable fares;
    ✔✔
    LEVERAGE FEDERAL FUNDING
    144.
    Invest an additional $152 million in capital expenditures to fully match the federal contribution of $460 million for the public transit infrastructure.
    ✔✔
    FUND PUBLIC TRANSIT
    145.
    Work with local governments to address funding for community and regional transportation infrastructure, and will examine tools such as mobility pricing to manage congestion and generate funds for public transportation upgrades.
    ✔✔
    INVEST IN CLEAN TECHNOLOGY
    146.
    Promote investment in clean transportation initiatives and technology that creates jobs and economic activity without increasing greenhouse gas emissions.

    In the Appendix on climate action transit is cited frequently as part of the broader strategy to reduce carbon emissions including this commitment

    Energy efficient community design can also play a major role in reducing emissions. Sprawl has been a feature of development in many cities across BC, as people move out of urban centres in search of affordable accommodation. This creates headaches for transportation planning, especially the provision of cost efficient public transit. It is not possible to reverse existing sprawl; however, action can be taken to reduce or eliminate further expansion of the built-up area. An efficient public transit system requires population density along major routes to be a key consideration in community planning.

  2. From the NDP:
    “…we will provide local governments the tools they are asking for to zone areas for rental housing, and tax short-stay home rentals that take properties out of the rental pool.”

  3. The Climate has to be the big issue.
    This is from the the BC Green Party.
    “British Columbians have been left without much credible opposition on the climate front. In 2009, the B.C. NDP ran on “axe the tax,” and they support new fossil fuel projects like LNG. In 2017, their climate plan only commits to doing what is required by the federal government, and does not include a concrete plan for achieving their targets for 2030.
    Climate change is not just an environmental issue. Acting on climate is about positioning B.C. to succeed in the emerging economy of the future and the world that we will leave for our children.
    We have a moral imperative to leave the world better off than we found it. If we don’t, future generations will ask why B.C., one of the places that had the most opportunity to be a leader on climate change, refused to act.
    A B.C. Green government will take bold action on climate change that will position B.C. to be a leader in the low-carbon economy.”

    1. Forward-looking climate policies from the Greens, worthy of being highlighted. You contrast them with the NDP, however, when the real contrast is with the Liberals. Unless, of course, we are to believe that Clark is serious about stopping thermal coal exports, and that seems a rather narrow issue compared to the rest of the Liberal platform.

      1. The same as the other posts here I quoted, this time from the Green platform document. It is they that contrasted their policy with the NDP.
        I was also particularly impressed with the Liberals intend to stop thermal coal exports. Thank you for pointing out this new policy.

        1. Given your previous comments over time, Eric, several here will undoubtedly interpret this as an ulterior promotion of vote splitting of the centre-left electorate. Your BC Liberal Christy-love cred is plain to see.

        2. Interesting Alex, that you consider the Greens to be attractive to those on the Centre-Left. They do seem to be going that way.

        3. It appears there is a trend in the past week of votes going from the Greens and NDP to the Liberals. The trend lines are quite clearly delineated in the latest CBC Poll Tracker. I find that puzzling given the Greens abhorrence to pipelines, and the fact the walkers stuck with the NDP’s no-Kinder Morgan stance from the start of the campaign until last week. The TV debate seems to have favoured the Libs over both of the others, at least temporarily.
          But I also think polling is an inexact science, and you have to take an average between many. Also, there was 10 days left after the latest polls, enough time for more change. Vote splitting is not to be dismissed. It is basic math. The last federal election saw a mass movement of a million strategic votes very late in the campaign that was pinpointed by some analysts to the Conservative’s last minute turn to an anti-Muslim narrative. That’s a million people who put aside conscience to vote with the math. It worked.
          At this stage placing bets in Vegas will probably get better results than on next Tuesday’s vote, based on last week’s polls.

      2. Eric posts “It is they that contrast their policy with the NDP”.
        Not completely true, you have committed an error of omission. It would be nice if you include the full quote, not just the part about the NDP. The two preceding paragraphs read as follows:
        “In 2008, B.C. became a global leader in climate action. The province developed a bold climate action plan to meet ambitious targets, guided by experts. It was grounded in science, based on reliable evidence and included a suite of measures that were predicted to take B.C. well over halfway to meeting its targets.
         
        Under Christy Clark’s B.C. Liberal government, B.C. has moved backwards. Of Canada’s four most populous provinces, only B.C. is projected to increase its emissions by 2030. The Clark government has frozen the price of carbon, ignored the recommendations of their own Climate Leadership Team and left the cleantech sector out to dry with no support. They have invested heavily in LNG and approved oil pipelines, hinging B.C.’s economic future on the sunset industry of fossil fuels.”
        http://www.bcgreens.ca/platform
        In any case, the important part follows:
        “Climate change is not just an environmental issue. Acting on climate is about positioning B.C. to succeed in the emerging economy of the future and the world that we will leave for our children.
         
        We have a moral imperative to leave the world better off than we found it. If we don’t, future generations will ask why B.C., one of the places that had the most opportunity to be a leader on climate change, refused to act.”
        Thank you Eric, for highlighting that climate has to be a big issue.
        If we see a minority government, the Greens will have a key role in keeping this file front and centre.

  4. This NDP election promise ( namely to tax an additional 2% annually to property owners not filing income taxes here in BC ) worthwhile https://www.biv.com/article/2017/3/ndp-would-expand-bcs-foreign-buyer-tax/
    This one ( to increase minimum wage to $15 and kills loads of entry level jobs ) is not: http://vancouversun.com/opinion/op-ed/opinion-ndp-labour-platform-detrimental-to-jobs-affordability
    No one is even mentioning our lack of adequate healthcare and lengthy unconstitutional wait lists ? http://theccf.ca/taking-a-stand-for-patients-rights-and-health-care-choice/

Subscribe to Viewpoint Vancouver

Get breaking news and fresh views, direct to your inbox.

Join 2,277 other subscribers

Show your Support

Check our Patreon page for stylish coffee mugs, private city tours, and more – or, make a one-time or recurring donation. Thank you for helping shape this place we love.

Popular Articles

See All

All Articles