February 7, 2017

Seniors' Care Housing and Why This Matters

png-merlin-archive9The Vancouver Sun’s Bethany Lindsay describes  B.C. Seniors’ Advocate Isobel Mackenzie  release of information that 27 per cent of residents in care homes in the province are being given anti psychotic medication without a diagnosis. The three care homes most overly medicating their clients without a diagnosis are in Metro Vancouver, with one, the Youville Residence in Vancouver medicating over 62 per cent of residents without a diagnosis. Anti psychotic medications can make people aggressive, and also contribute to drowsiness and subsequent falls, but can also make the patient easier for staff to manage.
Not only is overmedicating without a proper diagnosis a problem, the Seniors’ Advocate also reported that for staffing “no private for profit facilities meet the minimum standard as established by the Ministry of Health.” NONE.
Ninety-one per cent of care homes listed in the B.C. seniors advocate’s Residential Care Facilities Quick Facts failed to meet the ministry guidelines of 3.36 hours a day of care for each senior in 2015-2016.”  While care facilities that are run by health authorities may have frailer individuals requiring more care, the minimum standard is there to provide consistency of service .  Minister of Health Terry Lake suggests that this standard is “a planning guide…not every facility necessarily will need that level of care because people have different levels of need.”
The B.C. Care Providers Association has called for a 337 million dollar annual investment in seniors’ care, noting that The average age of someone coming into a care home is about 88. About 70 per cent of them have been diagnosed with some form of dementia. They are requiring a lot more intense care than they did 20 to 30 years ago.”

 As one commentator dryly noted, seniors in care homes don’t live long enough to rally for the change needed to make these facilities work better for the people who require them. By 2036 one in four Canadians will be a senior. We need to examine how best  to accommodate this growing sector through more efficiently operating and staffing  seniors’ care facilities. We also need to immediately trial different models of “aging in place” either in multi-unit adapted single family homes or by relaxing zoning restrictions to allow for more co-housing models in the local areas.  With a seniors’ population doubling in the next 25 years, we need to act now.

 
generic-pic-of-elderly-woman-being-given-pills-by-a-nurse-f

Posted in

Support

If you love this region and have a view to its future please subscribe, donate, or become a Patron.

Share on

Comments

  1. Post
    Author
  2. With the provincial debt at nearly $65B, an approaching tsunami of seniors needing healthcare services, and a penchant to spend like drunken sailors on bloated white elephants like Port Mann, Massey, a freeway up the sparsely-populated Sunshine Coast, Site C and LNG, heartache is certainly on the horizon for thousands of seniors and their families.
    In Alberta care facilities that receive subsidies are subject to multiple random inspections by ministry officials every year who have the right to interview patients and their families at their discretion, and the subsidy is on the line. I have no idea if the same policy exists here, but it seems elder care is much more lax in BC. The Libs will be quick to blame the health regions for a “poor allocation” of resources, of course, just like they blame school districts and TransLink fo their own underfunding.
    The sub-jurisdictions of the provincial government sure come in handy as a shield, don’t they?

Subscribe to Viewpoint Vancouver

Get breaking news and fresh views, direct to your inbox.

Join 2,277 other subscribers

Show your Support

Check our Patreon page for stylish coffee mugs, private city tours, and more – or, make a one-time or recurring donation. Thank you for helping shape this place we love.

Popular Articles

See All

All Articles