May 17, 2016

Item from Ian: The Transformation of Barcelona’s Eixample

From The Guardian:

barcelona

In the latest attempt from a big city to move away from car hegemony, Barcelona has ambitious plans. Currently faced with excessive pollution and noise levels, the city has come up with a new mobility plan to reduce traffic by 21%. And it comes with something extra: freeing up nearly 60% of streets currently used by cars to turn them into so-called “citizen spaces”. The plan is based around the idea of superilles (superblocks) – mini neighbourhoods around which traffic will flow, and in which spaces will be repurposed to “fill our city with life”, as its tagline says.

This plan will start in the famous gridded neighbourhood of Eixample. That revolutionary design, engineered by Ildefons Cerdà in the late 19th century, had at its core the idea that the city should breathe and – for both ideological and public health reasons – planned for the population to be spread out equally, as well as providing green spaces within each block. Reality and urban development have, however, got the best of it, and as the grid lines became choked with cars, the city’s pollution and noise levels have skyrocketed. What was once a design to make Barcelona healthier, now has to be dramatically rethought for the same reasons.

.

Barcelona 2

.

pricetags: It’s about time.  Despite the romanticization of the Cerdà plan (never ultimately built out in the way he intended), the result, as recognized above, was not that pleasant: wide streets, fast traffic, noisy and polluted.  And the relentless grid, standard heights and similar architecture actually make it hard to navigate.  Even the chamfered intersections are not that pedestrian friendly – full of parked cars and garbage bins.

Barc 1

Anywhere in the Eixample

Posted in

Support

If you love this region and have a view to its future please subscribe, donate, or become a Patron.

Share on

Comments

  1. It looks good. Similar to the West End’s traffic calming which has had a nice effect.
    I also like how things are predictable. When driving you can predict that every fourth street is a through street and easily navigate. (Unlike here.)
    The other streets are for local access only.
    They do a similar thing in the Netherlands. Everyone’s place is accessible by motor vehicle but they aren’t through-routes.

    1. The predictability is nice.
      Nothing worse that trying to get to point B in the West End and doubling back and forth and circling blocks.

  2. In effect, Kits is kind-of like this, with narrow-ish streets and then 4th, narrow-ish and then Broadway … this would just take it further.

    I think if the whole of downtown were considered more in this manner, it would both improve traffic, and lead to more walkability/bikeability elsewhere.

    This might also allow Robsonstraße to work – improve the network around it (its not like its far from Alberni/Georgia), and allow it to work better for people. Thats who use it most anyway (its certainly not a morning commuting route, judging by how easy it is to cross even without using beg buttons. Its only in the evenings and on weekends that it becomes hard to cross ie: its not needed for commuting, and doesn’t need to be retained for people cruising down robson in their pink metallic ferrari’s.

Subscribe to Viewpoint Vancouver

Get breaking news and fresh views, direct to your inbox.

Join 2,277 other subscribers

Show your Support

Check our Patreon page for stylish coffee mugs, private city tours, and more – or, make a one-time or recurring donation. Thank you for helping shape this place we love.

Popular Articles

See All

All Articles