Last night I attended the first Turncoats event in Vancouver (and saw a few of the Price Tags community there) – the first of what I hope to be many. For those unfamiliar with the Turncoats format (which included most people in the room last night), it was inspired by a series of events in London where a panel of four take two sides (two people per side) of a ‘fundamental issue facing contemporary (architecture) practice’. That said, the real intent of the format is to provoke a playful but combative debate and discussion, something many feel is missing in today’s Vancouver. To that end, no recording, tweeting, or other social media-ing is allowed to permit the participants full scope to speak freely without consequence (we all need to have a discussion in Vancouver about the state of discussion and dialogue – are we able to be critical in today’s city?).
Vancouver’s Architectural debates are rubbish.
We’ve all been there: a panel of similar designers with similar views taking it in turns to talk at length about their similar work – too polite, too deferential, too dull. At best they are lukewarm love-ins, critically impotent, elitist and stuffy. Turncoats is a shot in the arm. Framed by theatrically provocative opening gambits, a series of debates will rugby tackle fundamental issues facing contemporary practice with a playful and combative format designed to foment open and critical discussion, turning conventional consensus on its head.
– from the Turncoats website
Following a profoundly funny introduction on the importance of unimportance (I think?), there was a feisty debate on the question of originality versus style. Key arguments included the impossibility of originality (we live in a culture and context that situate even the most brazen attempts for true novelty will be seen, in time, as part of a distinctive style) and the primacy of process over iterative style as key to problem-solving and authenticity. The panel was exemplary: Clinton Cuddington of Measured Architecture, Fernanda Hannah of Monzu and Hannah Design, Javier Campos of Campos Studio (and President of Heritage Vancouver), and Alicia Media Laddaga of the Laboratory of Housing Alternatives and Marianne Amodio Architectural Studio (one of my most favourite design firms). Kudos to the organizing team of Tony Osborn and Kees Lokman, not only for making Turncoats happen (the first export of the format outside of London), but for choosing a panel of folks beyond the ‘usual suspects’ but all sharp, smart, witty and insightful.
In the end, it was one of those events that reaffirms my optimism about Vancouver. There is a tremendous bounty of smart and engaged young(ish) people ready and willing to take on the difficult debates we need to have to advance our city forward. All we need are the right platforms and opportunities to have those debates and discussions. Turncoats can be one of them and I both look forward to the next iteration and recommend all Price Tags readers to check it out (I found out about the event through the also wonderful Urbanarium).
Sounds like a great idea. Vancouver deserves its own fierce critic a la Ada Louise Huxtable.