Here are my initial comments on the just-released transportation plan for the city, as reported by CTV British Columbia:
Vancouver has unveiled an aggressive transportation plan that would see two-thirds of all trips taken within the city by transit, cycling or walking by the year 2040.
To achieve that target, the city is proposing numerous attention-grabbing strategies – the least controversial being the long-awaited underground transit line along the Broadway corridor.
But other measures, such as implementing more bike lanes, eliminating car access on certain streets and removing parking from others, are certain to irk motorists.
Related: Read the full report here
Transportation expert Gord Price said the city’s goal is actually more realistic than it might seem.
Past estimates about declining vehicle trips have actually turned out to be too conservative, Price argued, and car use in Vancouver is already down to 1965-levels.
“The one thing that we do know from our experience in Vancouver is that if we build transit, particularly rail transit, boy, will people use it,” Price said.
The city isn’t trying to force people out of their cars, he added, but to make alternative options for walking, cycling and transit more practical.
“Then people will be much more willing to mix and match – to match up the choice for the kind of trip they’re taking with the options available.”
The multi-faceted report suggests the current car-free section of Robson Street may be joined by similar installations on Hamilton and Mainland streets in Yaletown and on Water Street in Gastown. Another section of Robson Street could also become “pedestrian-priority.”
For promoting cycling, the report suggests adding bike lockers and bike racks to parking lots, implementing a bike share system and potentially adding bike lanes to the Granville and Cambie bridges.
The costs of the ambitious project, and where the funding will come from, are unknown however. The report suggests $70 million in funding will be allocated between now and 2014, but says all further estimates will require further planning.
City council is expected to vote on the report next week.
I’ve posted on the ‘conservative’ history of past transportation plans here:
In 1976, for instance, the car was the choice of 90 percent of everyone who moved around within Vancouver’s borders. The plan of that time called for the percentage to drop to 75 percent. (There was no target date, likely because the planners and engineers never thought it would be reached in their lifetimes.)
So what actually happened?
By 1992, the number was down to 70 percent for vehicles. What might have seemed an unrealistic target in the heyday of Motordom was surpassed.
Next up: the Transportation Plan of 1997. It forecast driving would drop to 58 percent by 2021. Even that far out, it seemed ambitious.
What actually happened?
We got to 58 percent by 2008.
UPDATE: A fan writes –
Lets be clear your not a expert on transportation you just think you are, you are a pro biker with a one sided bias with bikers the freeloaders of our society that pay little or no taxes, this transportation plan by the city of Vancouver must be voted on by 600,000 + residents and that applies to other project in Metro Vancouver, As conservative voter when we win the election we change the municipal act to force the mayors council out from making decisions on Transportation, also the act will be changed that Vancouver councils cannot make decisions on property that is owned by the people of BC, the expanded casino and relocation will come back again with BC residents Voting on this project.Tolls will be set up for bikers to pay and they will not be allowed on the sea wall any where only pedestrians and green electric golf carts.– Ken L













I believe we can surpass this target too, at least in the city of Vancouver. That said, I think we need a region-wide target that is equally as ambitious, because Vancouver will mean very little if Gateway and the resulting Motordom continues unabated south of the Fraser.
I’ve looked a little more at the goal for car-use, and it’s interesting to note that they don’t project car-use to drop by much at all in Vancouver. The drop in the percentage of trips comes from a large increase in the number of other trips in the city. Basically, as the city grows car trips are staying the same and all the new trips are coming from transit, walking, biking, etc.
While this is still a good thing, I wonder about the greenhouse gas implications of this policy. As most of us are aware, the transportation sector is the biggest contributor of greenhouse gases in B.C., and if Vancouver, the best jurisdiction in the whole province when it comes to alternative transportation options to the car, can’t actually decrease car use, then how are we going to lower our province’s greenhouse gas emissions enough to prevent catastrophic climate change? Especially when Gateway is leading the South of the Fraser in a totally different direction.
The mayor of Calgary is looking pretty good on the Canadian political landscape.
I apologize for posting the previous reply here. It was intended for another, somewhat related price tag. Gordon, you certainly are a busy man! Hard to keep up with it all!
Awesome plan. Thanks for the historical context Gordon. There’s some good stuff in the there, including pedestrian-priority streets and AAA bike routes, plus small things like getting bike share and the water ferries to integrate with Compass.
Ken L would probably be local old-man curmudgeon Ken Lawson. He’s my favourite local internet troll.
I NOW VIEW DRIVING IN THE CITY AS MORALLY WRONG
Eight-three pages! WHAT? Looks like they’ve blown the budget already.
Don’t be surprised, all you shiny trinket aficionados, when you wake up January 01, 2040, Translink has been banished to the nether regions, horse drawn buggies, accompanied by the usual street droppings, are back and Gord has gone fishin’.
There is a better way yunno . . .
http://members.shaw.ca/theyorkshirelad72/working.mount.pleasant.html
. . .
http://www.theyorkshirelad.ca/1yorkshirelad/vancouver.re-boot/Vancouver.re-boot.html
. . . but errrrrr, wax in ears!