September 13, 2012

Have there ever been “A Hundred Deathless Days”?

David Banks makes a good point:

Fascinating article (and blog post) indeed. …   Considering Vancouver’s annual pedestrian mortality rate, I wonder if we have ever achieved 100 days…

.

Globe article here.

Posted in

Support

If you love this region and have a view to its future please subscribe, donate, or become a Patron.

Share on

Comments

  1. Sigh, reply zapped by an accidental keystroke. That never happened with typewriters.

    In short. the 1939 Sun had a point, only 18% of ped. fatalites are the ped.s fault. Motorists, over 1/2 of fatalities are when you’re turning. Slow down, when turning tire squealing jackrabbit turns save almost 0 time. The 7 month streak has been broken several times over, but let’s strive to keep the 2010 total under 10.

    http://www.openfile.ca/vancouver/blog/vancouver/2012/most-pedestrian-vehicle-collisions-vancouver-involved-drivers-not-yielding-study

  2. Eight so far this year. For those of a morbid disposition, the media term to search for is “traffic-related fatality”: https://www.google.ca/search?q=vancouver+%22traffic-related+fatality%22

    So an average of one every 30 days. In the “greenest city” on earth.

    This would make a great single-serving site: can somebody go register ahundreddeathlessdays.ca ?

    So what should we do what is the policy response? Easy:

    1. Ban: pedestrian only streets.
    2. Separate: complete streets, multiway boulevards.
    3. Tame: narrow, bulge, wiggle, twist. Roundabouts.

Subscribe to Viewpoint Vancouver

Get breaking news and fresh views, direct to your inbox.

Join 2,277 other subscribers

Show your Support

Check our Patreon page for stylish coffee mugs, private city tours, and more – or, make a one-time or recurring donation. Thank you for helping shape this place we love.

Popular Articles

See All

All Articles