An occasional update on items from ‘Motordom‘ – the world of auto dominance.
UPDATE ON THE CLEM7
For the backstory on this tolled tunnel under Brisbane, go here. For an update, here’s an item from the Brisbane Times:
Shunning the Clem7
Brisbane motorists have continued to avoid the Clem7 tunnel, prompting its operators to extend a toll discount period to the end of the financial year. In figures released to the Australian Stock Exchange this afternoon, the tunnel’s operator RiverCity Motorway revealed an average of just 21,178 vehicles used the toll road daily.
The highest number of trips on a single workday during the month was 25,688. By the company’s own admission, that was ‘well below the start-up forecast of approximately 60,000 trips per day’.
Ref: Cameron Atfield, Brisbane Times, 4/5/10
Will you use the tunnel now that the discounted toll period has been extended to the end of the financial year?
Yes: 19%; No: 81%, Votes: 1,263”
_____________________________________________________
MOTORDOM IN KENTUCKY
One would have thought the days of spending billions to build massive overhead freeway infrastructure along a city’s waterfront was well and truly over. Indeed, many cities like Seattle aspire to tearing such structures down.
Not in Louisville, Kentucky.
Already I-64 and a floodwall cut off the city from its waterfront. But that’s not sufficient. So now there’s a proposal to spend over $4 billion to build a redundant bridge and a whole lot of spaghetti to create this:
Which would look like this:
I’m sure there all kinds of justifications for this proposal, which you can find out more about here.
What astonishes me is that there’s a $1 billion shortfall in the highway program alone, not to mention huge budget problems in the state. And this proposal is only one part of a larger bridge-and-road project.
Motordom has been so used to unlimited resources for most of the last century that, in America, it considers itself in the same category as the armed forces. Whenever an advocate for small government in the States calls for drastic cuts in budgets and taxes, they don’t mean the military and they don’t mean the roads.
_____________________________________________________
“RUNNING ON EMPTY”
What if tomorrow everyone’s car disappeared?
It would look like this – at least in LA:
_____________________________________________________
Do We Tolerate Too Many Traffic Deaths?
The New York Times asks: What’s the
one thing that could be done to reduce highway deaths?
And some selected bloggers, including recent SFU City Program speaker Dan Burden, respond.
Click here for the bloggers.















Re: Running on Empty
Wow, removing all the vehicles really emphasizes how desolate asphalt roads really are as public spaces. I can just imagine those street scenes, without cars but with people walking; years of habit would force everyone to walk on the sidewalks, leaving empty swaths of wasteland in the middle…
Links for the last part not working?
It is interesting to witness that “urban” Toll Road across the world generate far less traffic than expected..
Beside Sidney, it was also the case of the Paris’ A14:
150% over budget, operational cost 20% above budget, traffic twice less below prediction !
( http://www.cgedd.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/A14_AVIS_cle5e5857.pdf ).
It is the case of the Golden Ears bridge, and will probably be the case of the Port Mann Bridge :
It is no accident that in despite of its P3 ideology bias, the BC government miserably failed to secure a single private penny investment in was suppose to be a P3 showcase project which is already twice over budget and still counting…
I have to disagree with Corey – I think if cars are truly gone then people will reclaim the street quite decisively and quite quickly, even if they do suck as public spaces.
Any paved space looks desolate without anything on it (whether cars or people) – look at Toronto wanting to “revitalize” Nathan Phillips Square.
You could take the same photo of an airport runway – but then, an airport runway (or a freeway) isn’t a place where you’d want your kids running around, now is it?
Same applies to warehouses, loading docks, wharfs, or industrial lands – I guess that’s why so many people want to tear them up and put in housing and retail.
===>>> Voony
We all know that Translink’s data on transit ridership is rather questionable, so the claims that everything is going swimmingly with traffic on the RAV line are of no value.
If the counts for the Golden Ears Bridge are right, and why wouldn’t they be, then at least we know where we stand. I find it beyond belief that people are judging the demand for a 100 -200 year project based on its first year of operation. That kind of approach cannot be used to deceive even the most simple minded people. That doesn’t mean it won’t be tried.
Gord, this topic always reminds me of a play I saw back in the early 90s at the Fringe Festival (when it used to be on Main street). The play was titled Autogeddon, and it was a multimedia production based upon the poem by Heathcote Williams.
To your question, “Do we tolerate too many traffic deaths”? Here’s a quote below from Williams which really stuck with me. It’s heavy, but hard to forget…
MORE than twice the number in the death-camps,
A hundred and thirty times the kill at Hiroshima,
Eight times the count in Korea,
Two hundred and thirty Vietnams,
Eight thousand five hundred Ulsters . . .
The Hundred Years War in a week;
The Crusades in under thirty seconds.
A Black Death with bubonic rats on wheels,
A quarter of a million ‘auto-fatalities’ a year―
The humdrum holocaust―
The fast-food―junk-death―road-show.
Take any accident ward
Trying to service a few de-stocked slices
From the 250,000 a year
Wheeled in on stiff-scoops
To brain and body garages
By whistling ambulance men.
http://cfu.freehostia.com/Members/colin/autogeddon/
Here are two links to more information about the Ohio River Bridges Project.
Louisville and Southern Indiana Bridges Authority (Project Owner)
http://www.bridgesauthority.com/
“86-64” a grassroots organization in Louisville, KY promoting an alternative to the $4.1 Billion Ohio River Bridges Project http://www.8664.org/